The
panopticon was conceived in 1785 by Jeremy Bentham, a British philosopher and critical thinker. The panopticon is a building, a penal facility, where convicted criminals are held for the protection of the remainder of society, or for more punitive reasons, depending on your stance on the matter. Bentham was a utilitarian thinker, he was also relatively progressive. He argued in favour of the decriminalisation of homosexuality, equality for women, the abolition of slavery and of the death penalty and furthermore argued against the use of corporal punishment.
Instead, he proferred the panopticon, a term of his own devising. In the panopticon, the prisoners exist under the illusion that they are being continually observed by an unseen prison warden. In his own words, the panopticon was: "A new mode of obtaining power of mind over mind, in a quantity hitherto without example: and that, to a degree equally without example, secured by whoever chooses to have it so, against abuse." Bentham's letters go on to explain the possibility of extending the use of the panopticon into schools, hospitals and mental institutions ("mad-houses"), before closing with the remark: "What would you say, if by the gradual adoption and diversified application of this single principle, you should see a new scene of things spread itself over the face of civilized society? - morals reformed, health preserved, industry invigorated, instruction diffused, public burthens lightened, economy seated as it were upon a rock, the gordian knot of the poor-laws not cut but untied - all by a simple idea in architecture?"
The panopticon therefore encourages a version of the Hawthorne Effect, where a sampled peoples' behaviour is modified by the knowledge that they are being observed. Bentham's idea of the panopticon however, creates and encourages the illusion that the prisoners are under constant surveillance; and moreover that at any given moment they do not know whether they are being observed or not. This belief/uncertainty produces the same effect in a populace as actual observation, and causes the populace to internalise to an extent the expectations placed on their behaviour by their observer, regardless of his/her uncertain existence.
In today's World I see this "Panopticon-Effect" becoming ever more pervasive. Imagine the fake CCTV cameras available for people to buy and place around the outside of their homes. What of the banks of real CCTV cameras in railway stations and on the street? What about idea (ever forwarded by crime and spy dramas) that our phone calls can be traced, or that our movements can be tracked by the use of our Oyster Cards? How about the internet, where our supposed anonymity is a joke; where one's Facebook profile and laxity in privacy settings can allow almost anybody to follow one's actions. What about blogging?
The point is, that more and more people seem to exist in this state of induced submissiveness, in which the subconscious awareness of the omniscience of "the authorities" transforms the population in to a more easily controllable herd.
"To think for yourself you must question authority and learn how to put yourself into a state of vulnerability- chaotic, confused, vulnerability; to inform yourself." -T. Leary.